3D Bounding Box Detection in Volumetric Medical Image Data: A Systematic Literature Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper discusses current methods and trends for 3D bounding box detection in volumetric medical image data. For this purpose, an overview of relevant papers from recent years is given. 2D and 3D implementations are discussed and compared. Multiple identified approaches for localizing anatomical structures are presented. The results show that most research recently focuses on Deep Learning methods, such as Convolutional Neural Networks vs. methods with manual feature engineering, e.g. Random-Regression-Forests. An overview of bounding box detection options is presented and helps researchers to select the most promising approach for their target objects.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Comparison of 2D vs. 3D U-Net Organ Segmentation in abdominal 3D CT imagescited by 4
- 2023Multiple Instance Ensembling For Paranasal Anomaly Classification In The Maxillary Sinuscited by 1
- 2022A tomographic workflow to enable deep learning for X-ray based foreign object detectioncited by 0
- 2023Gravity Network for end-to-end small lesion detectioncited by 0
- 2026YOLO-PVC: 2D-to-3D Consolidation of Slice-wise Detections for Volumetric Liver Tumor Localization in MRIcited by 0
- 2026YOLO-PVC: 2D-to-3D Consolidation of Slice-wise Detections for Volumetric Liver Tumor Localization in MRI5 Aug 2026
- 2023Gravity Network for end-to-end small lesion detection22 Sep 2023
- 2023Multiple Instance Ensembling For Paranasal Anomaly Classification In The Maxillary Sinus31 Mar 2023
- 2022A tomographic workflow to enable deep learning for X-ray based foreign object detection28 Jan 2022
- 2021Comparison of 2D vs. 3D U-Net Organ Segmentation in abdominal 3D CT images8 Jul 2021