mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Debiased-CAM to mitigate image perturbations with faithful visual explanations of machine learning

arXiv 2012.05567 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2020cs.CV cs.CY cs.HCcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias) by perturbations and corruptions. Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

11 papers.