Debiased-CAM to mitigate image perturbations with faithful visual explanations of machine learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias) by perturbations and corruptions. Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2022Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanationscited by 85
- 2023A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AIcited by 6
- 2024How explainable AI affects human performance: A systematic review of the behavioural consequences of saliency mapscited by 6
- 2023Statistically Significant Concept-based Explanation of Image Classifiers via Model Knockoffscited by 4
- 2025On the Design and Evaluation of Human-centered Explainable AI Systems: A Systematic Review and Taxonomycited by 3
- 2026Comparables XAI: Faithful Example-based AI Explanations with Counterfactual Trace Adjustmentscited by 1
- 2023Beyond XAI:Obstacles Towards Responsible AIcited by 0
- 2024TA3: Testing Against Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning Modelscited by 0
- 2026SketchXplain: Intuitive Visual Explanations of Image Classifiers with Sketchescited by 0
- 2026Class Activation Mapping in Explainable Computer Vision: A Method-Centered Review of CNN, Transformer, and Foundation-Model-Era Visual Explanationscited by 0
- 2026AlignFace: Human-Aligned Face Similarity Metric with Interpretable Concept Relationscited by 0
- 2026AlignFace: Human-Aligned Face Similarity Metric with Interpretable Concept Relations14 Aug 2026
- 2026Class Activation Mapping in Explainable Computer Vision: A Method-Centered Review of CNN, Transformer, and Foundation-Model-Era Visual Explanations12 Aug 2026
- 2026SketchXplain: Intuitive Visual Explanations of Image Classifiers with Sketches16 Jun 2026
- 2026Comparables XAI: Faithful Example-based AI Explanations with Counterfactual Trace Adjustments14 Feb 2026
- 2025On the Design and Evaluation of Human-centered Explainable AI Systems: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy14 Oct 2025
- 2024TA3: Testing Against Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning Models6 Oct 2024
- 2024How explainable AI affects human performance: A systematic review of the behavioural consequences of saliency maps3 Apr 2024
- 2023Beyond XAI:Obstacles Towards Responsible AI7 Sep 2023
- 2023Statistically Significant Concept-based Explanation of Image Classifiers via Model Knockoffs27 May 2023
- 2023A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AI10 Feb 2023
- 2022Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations20 Oct 2022