mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Majority Opinion Diffusion in Social Networks: An Adversarial Approach

arXiv 2012.03143 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2020cs.DS cs.AI cs.DMcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce and study a novel majority-based opinion diffusion model. Consider a graph G, which represents a social network. Assume that initially a subset of nodes, called seed nodes or early adopters, are colored either black or white, which correspond to positive or negative opinion regarding a consumer product or a technological innovation. Then, in each round an uncolored node, which is adjacent to at least one colored node, chooses the most frequent color among its neighbors. Consider a marketing campaign which advertises a product of poor quality and its ultimate goal is that more than half of the population believe in the quality of the product at the end of the opinion diffusion process. We focus on three types of attackers which can select the seed nodes in a deterministic or random fashion and manipulate almost half of them to adopt a positive opinion toward the product (that is, to choose black color). We say that an attacker succeeds if a majority of nodes are black at the end of the process. Our main purpose is to characterize classes of graphs where an attacker cannot succeed. In particular, we prove that if the maximum degree of the underlying graph is not too large or if it has strong expansion properties, then it is fairly resilient to such attacks. Furthermore, we prove tight bounds on the stabilization time of the process (that is, the number of rounds it needs to end) in both settings of choosing the seed nodes deterministically and randomly. We also provide several hardness results for some optimization problems regarding stabilization time and choice of seed nodes.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 12 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2020.

Builds on

12 of 53 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Concentration and regularization of random graphscited by 24
  2. 2017Controlling Elections through Social Influencecited by 6
  3. 2019Convergence of Opinion Diffusion is PSPACE-completecited by 6
  4. 2020Biased Opinion Dynamics: When the Devil Is in the Detailscited by 5
  5. 2018Opinion Forming in Erdos-Renyi Random Graph and Expanderscited by 4
  6. 2020Opinion Diffusion and Campaigning on Society Graphscited by 3
  7. 2017Majority Model on Random Regular Graphscited by 2
  8. 2018Approximation Algorithm for the Partial Set Multi-Cover Problemcited by 2
  9. 2015On the Voting Time of the Deterministic Majority Processcited by 1
  10. 2018Agent-based opinion formation modeling in social network: a perspective of social psychologycited by 1
  11. 2018Tight Bounds on the Minimum Size of a Dynamic Monopolycited by 1
  12. 2020Spread of Influence in Graphscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Pressure-Based Diffusion Model for Influence Maximization on Social Networks
  2. 2022Contextual Bandits for Advertising Campaigns: A Diffusion-Model Independent Approach (Extended Version)
  3. 2026Inference Attacks Against Graph Generative Diffusion Models
  4. 2024Towards understanding Diffusion Models (on Graphs)
  5. 2026Bias mitigation in graph diffusion models
  6. 2023Complex Preferences for Different Convergent Priors in Discrete Graph Diffusion
  7. 2020StratLearner: Learning a Strategy for Misinformation Prevention in Social Networks
  8. 2025Backdoor Attacks on Discrete Graph Diffusion Models