Evaluating (weighted) dynamic treatment effects by double machine learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider evaluating the causal effects of dynamic treatments, i.e. of multiple treatment sequences in various periods, based on double machine learning to control for observed, time-varying covariates in a data-driven way under a selection-on-observables assumption. To this end, we make use of so-called Neyman-orthogonal score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate (local) misspecifications of the dynamic outcome and treatment models. This robustness property permits approximating outcome and treatment models by double machine learning even under high dimensional covariates and is combined with data splitting to prevent overfitting. In addition to effect estimation for the total population, we consider weighted estimation that permits assessing dynamic treatment effects in specific subgroups, e.g. among those treated in the first treatment period. We demonstrate that the estimators are asymptotically normal and √n-consistent under specific regularity conditions and investigate their finite sample properties in a simulation study. Finally, we apply the methods to the Job Corps study in order to assess different sequences of training programs under a large set of covariates.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Novel Treatmentscited by 7
- 2023Semi-parametric inference based on adaptively collected datacited by 6
- 2021Sequential Kernel Embedding for Mediated and Time-Varying Dose Response Curvescited by 5
- 2023Doubly Robust Estimation of Direct and Indirect Quantile Treatment Effects with Machine Learningcited by 3
- 2022How causal machine learning can leverage marketing strategies: Assessing and improving the performance of a coupon campaigncited by 2
- 2024Inverting estimating equations for causal inference on quantilescited by 1
- 2024Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutionscited by 1
- 2025Late Fusion Multi-task Learning for Semiparametric Inference with Nuisance Parameterscited by 1
- 2021Dynamic covariate balancing: estimating treatment effects over time with potential local projectionscited by 0
- 2023A Meta-Learning Method for Estimation of Causal Excursion Effects to Assess Time-Varying Moderationcited by 0
- 2026Deep Doubly Debiased Longitudinal Effect Estimation with ICE G-Computationcited by 0
- 2026Deep Doubly Debiased Longitudinal Effect Estimation with ICE G-Computation12 Feb 2026
- 2025Late Fusion Multi-task Learning for Semiparametric Inference with Nuisance Parameters10 Jul 2025
- 2024Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions2 Sep 2024
- 2024Inverting estimating equations for causal inference on quantiles2 Jan 2024
- 2023Doubly Robust Estimation of Direct and Indirect Quantile Treatment Effects with Machine Learning3 Jul 2023
- 2023A Meta-Learning Method for Estimation of Causal Excursion Effects to Assess Time-Varying Moderation28 Jun 2023
- 2023Semi-parametric inference based on adaptively collected data5 Mar 2023
- 2022How causal machine learning can leverage marketing strategies: Assessing and improving the performance of a coupon campaign22 Apr 2022
- 2021Sequential Kernel Embedding for Mediated and Time-Varying Dose Response Curves6 Nov 2021
- 2021Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Novel Treatments15 Mar 2021
- 2021Dynamic covariate balancing: estimating treatment effects over time with potential local projections1 Mar 2021