mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Towards Better Accuracy-efficiency Trade-offs: Divide and Co-training

arXiv 2011.14660 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2020cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The width of a neural network matters since increasing the width will necessarily increase the model capacity. However, the performance of a network does not improve linearly with the width and soon gets saturated. In this case, we argue that increasing the number of networks (ensemble) can achieve better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs than purely increasing the width. To prove it, one large network is divided into several small ones regarding its parameters and regularization components. Each of these small networks has a fraction of the original one's parameters. We then train these small networks together and make them see various views of the same data to increase their diversity. During this co-training process, networks can also learn from each other. As a result, small networks can achieve better ensemble performance than the large one with few or no extra parameters or FLOPs, ie, achieving better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs. Small networks can also achieve faster inference speed than the large one by concurrent running. All of the above shows that the number of networks is a new dimension of model scaling. We validate our argument with 8 different neural architectures on common benchmarks through extensive experiments. The code is available at urlhttps://github.com/FreeformRobotics/Divide-and-Co-training.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

12 papers.