mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FFCI: A Framework for Interpretable Automatic Evaluation of Summarization

arXiv 2011.13662 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2020cs.CLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose FFCI, a framework for fine-grained summarization evaluation that comprises four elements: faithfulness (degree of factual consistency with the source), focus (precision of summary content relative to the reference), coverage (recall of summary content relative to the reference), and inter-sentential coherence (document fluency between adjacent sentences). We construct a novel dataset for focus, coverage, and inter-sentential coherence, and develop automatic methods for evaluating each of the four dimensions of FFCI based on cross-comparison of evaluation metrics and model-based evaluation methods, including question answering (QA) approaches, semantic textual similarity (STS), next-sentence prediction (NSP), and scores derived from 19 pre-trained language models. We then apply the developed metrics in evaluating a broad range of summarization models across two datasets, with some surprising findings.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 6; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

24 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
  2. 2021The Factual Inconsistency Problem in Abstractive Text Summarization: A Surveycited by 79
  3. 2021Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimationcited by 37
  4. 2024AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifyingcited by 34
  5. 2022Learning to Revise References for Faithful Summarizationcited by 28
  6. 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
  7. 2023Summarizing Multiple Documents with Conversational Structure for Meta-Review Generationcited by 27
  8. 2021Investigating Crowdsourcing Protocols for Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 15
  9. 2023APPLS: Evaluating Evaluation Metrics for Plain Language Summarizationcited by 15
  10. 2021Evaluating the Efficacy of Summarization Evaluation across Languagescited by 14
  11. 2024Evaluating Document Simplification: On the Importance of Separately Assessing Simplicity and Meaning Preservationcited by 5
  12. 2024Using Similarity to Evaluate Factual Consistency in Summariescited by 5
12 more
  1. 2022Podcast Summary Assessment: A Resource for Evaluating Summary Assessment Methodscited by 4
  2. 2022How to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and a Comparative Study for Summary Coherence Measure Evaluationcited by 4
  3. 2021Graphmax for Text Generationcited by 2
  4. 2022PeerSum: A Peer Review Dataset for Abstractive Multi-document Summarizationcited by 2
  5. 2024A Critical Look at Meta-evaluating Summarisation Evaluation Metricscited by 2
  6. 2025Evaluating the Evaluator: Summarization Metrics and LLM-Judges beyond Englishcited by 2
  7. 2022Just ClozE! A Novel Framework for Evaluating the Factual Consistency Faster in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 0
  8. 2023Evaluating the Efficacy of Length-Controllable Machine Translationcited by 0
  9. 2023Evaluation of Faithfulness Using the Longest Supported Subsequencecited by 0
  10. 2025Revisiting Metric Reliability for Fine-grained Evaluation of Machine Translation and Summarization in Indian Languagescited by 0
  11. 2025Leveraging Hierarchical Organization for Medical Multi-document Summarizationcited by 0
  12. 2026Faithful or Fabricated? A Causal Framework for Rationalization Bias in LLM Judgescited by 0