NLPStatTest: A Toolkit for Comparing NLP System Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Statistical significance testing centered on p-values is commonly used to compare NLP system performance, but p-values alone are insufficient because statistical significance differs from practical significance. The latter can be measured by estimating effect size. In this paper, we propose a three-stage procedure for comparing NLP system performance and provide a toolkit, NLPStatTest, that automates the process. Users can upload NLP system evaluation scores and the toolkit will analyze these scores, run appropriate significance tests, estimate effect size, and conduct power analysis to estimate Type II error. The toolkit provides a convenient and systematic way to compare NLP system performance that goes beyond statistical significance testing
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Why only Micro-F1? Class Weighting of Measures for Relation Classificationcited by 8
- 2025Translation Analytics for Freelancers: I. Introduction, Data Preparation, Baseline Evaluationscited by 2
- 2024No Argument Left Behind: Overlapping Chunks for Faster Processing of Arbitrarily Long Legal Textscited by 1
- 2025Translation Analytics for Freelancers: I. Introduction, Data Preparation, Baseline Evaluations20 Apr 2025
- 2024No Argument Left Behind: Overlapping Chunks for Faster Processing of Arbitrarily Long Legal Texts24 Oct 2024
- 2022Why only Micro-F1? Class Weighting of Measures for Relation Classification19 May 2022