Like a Researcher Stating Broader Impact For the Very First Time
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In requiring that a statement of broader impact accompany all submissions for this year's conference, the NeurIPS program chairs made ethics part of the stake in groundbreaking AI research. While there is precedent from other fields and increasing awareness within the NeurIPS community, this paper seeks to answer the question of how individual researchers reacted to the new requirement, including not just their views, but also their experience in drafting and their reflections after paper acceptances. We present survey results and considerations to inform the next iteration of the broader impact requirement should it remain a requirement for future NeurIPS conferences.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
- 2021AI Ethics Statements -- Analysis and lessons learnt from NeurIPS Broader Impact Statementscited by 16
- 2024BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital Technologiescited by 6
- 2025Societal AI Research Has Become Less Interdisciplinarycited by 0
- 2025Societal AI Research Has Become Less Interdisciplinary10 Jun 2025
- 2024BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital Technologies10 May 2024
- 2021AI Ethics Statements -- Analysis and lessons learnt from NeurIPS Broader Impact Statements2 Nov 2021
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Papers6 Aug 2021
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research29 Jun 2021