mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physics-informed neural networks for myocardial perfusion MRI quantification

arXiv 2011.12844 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2020eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tracer-kinetic models allow for the quantification of kinetic parameters such as blood flow from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images. Fitting the observed data with multi-compartment exchange models is desirable, as they are physiologically plausible and resolve directly for blood flow and microvascular function. However, the reliability of model fitting is limited by the low signal-to-noise ratio, temporal resolution, and acquisition length. This may result in inaccurate parameter estimates. This study introduces physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) as a means to perform myocardial perfusion MR quantification, which provides a versatile scheme for the inference of kinetic parameters. These neural networks can be trained to fit the observed perfusion MR data while respecting the underlying physical conservation laws described by a multi-compartment exchange model. Here, we provide a framework for the implementation of PINNs in myocardial perfusion MR. The approach is validated both in silico and in vivo. In the in silico study, an overall reduction in mean-squared error with the ground-truth parameters was observed compared to a standard non-linear least squares fitting approach. The in vivo study demonstrates that the method produces parameter values comparable to those previously found in literature, as well as providing parameter maps which match the clinical diagnosis of patients.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 71
  2. 2023Physics-Informed Computer Vision: A Review and Perspectivescited by 28
  3. 2022Physics-driven Synthetic Data Learning for Biomedical Magnetic Resonancecited by 21
  4. 2024Med-Real2Sim: Non-Invasive Medical Digital Twins using Physics-Informed Self-Supervised Learningcited by 8
  5. 2025Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineeringcited by 4
  6. 2024Point Neuron Learning: A New Physics-Informed Neural Network Architecturecited by 2
  7. 2021Towards Optimally Weighted Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Ocean Modellingcited by 1
  8. 2022Utilising physics-guided deep learning to overcome data scarcitycited by 1
  9. 2023A Novel Training Framework for Physics-informed Neural Networks: Towards Real-time Applications in Ultrafast Ultrasound Blood Flow Imagingcited by 1
  10. 2024Gradient Flow Based Phase-Field Modeling Using Separable Neural Networkscited by 1
  11. 2023An Analysis of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
  12. 2024Quantitative Analysis of Molecular Transport in the Extracellular Space Using Physics-Informed Neural Networkcited by 0
6 more
  1. 2024Learning Traveling Solitary Waves Using Separable Gaussian Neural Networkscited by 0
  2. 2024PINNing Cerebral Blood Flow: Analysis of Perfusion MRI in Infants using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
  3. 2025Are Statistical Methods Obsolete in the Era of Deep Learning? A Study of ODE Inverse Problemscited by 0
  4. 2025Deep learning motion correction of quantitative stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonancecited by 0
  5. 2026MARVEL: Universal Murray's Law-informed Vessel Tree Segmentation and Topology Estimationcited by 0
  6. 2026Physics-Informed Implicit Neural Representations for Improved Myocardial Perfusion MRI Quantificationcited by 0