Ranking Deep Learning Generalization using Label Variation in Latent Geometry Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Measuring the generalization performance of a Deep Neural Network (DNN) without relying on a validation set is a difficult task. In this work, we propose exploiting Latent Geometry Graphs (LGGs) to represent the latent spaces of trained DNN architectures. Such graphs are obtained by connecting samples that yield similar latent representations at a given layer of the considered DNN. We then obtain a generalization score by looking at how strongly connected are samples of distinct classes in LGGs. This score allowed us to rank 3rd on the NeurIPS 2020 Predicting Generalization in Deep Learning (PGDL) competition.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Measuring Generalization with Optimal Transportcited by 25
- 2022Predicting the generalization gap in neural networks using topological data analysiscited by 9
- 2021On Predicting Generalization using GANscited by 6
- 2022Weight Expansion: A New Perspective on Dropout and Generalizationcited by 6
- 2024Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2021On the Effects of Artificial Data Modificationcited by 2
- 2024Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks6 Jun 2024
- 2022Predicting the generalization gap in neural networks using topological data analysis23 Mar 2022
- 2022Weight Expansion: A New Perspective on Dropout and Generalization23 Jan 2022
- 2021On Predicting Generalization using GANs28 Nov 2021
- 2021On the Effects of Artificial Data Modification26 Oct 2021
- 2021Measuring Generalization with Optimal Transport7 Jun 2021