InTAS -- The Ingolstadt Traffic Scenario for SUMO
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) are expected to be the next big step towards safer road transport, supporting applications to exchange information between vehicles. To develop novel applications for this area a high number of tests, considering all traffic situations, are demanded. However, it is unfeasible to reproduce these tests in real life, by the fact that any failure on the applications would cause severe impacts on transport system safety and could risk human lives. Thus, this paper presents the concept, model, and validation for InTAS, a realistic traffic scenario for Ingolstadt. InTAS road topology accurately represents Ingolstadt real road map. Elements such as buildings, bus stops, and traffic lights were added to the map. Twenty traffic lights systems were simulated according to the real program deployed on the traffic lights. Traffic demand was modeled based on the activitygen method, considering demographic data and real-traffic information. The city public transport system was also simulated accordingly to bus time-tables and their routes. The simulation step was implemented considering the best value for device.rerouting.probability, which was defined by evaluating InTAS output and real traffic data. The scenario was validated by comparing real-traffic data from 24 measurement points with InTAS simulation results.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023DuaLight: Enhancing Traffic Signal Control by Leveraging Scenario-Specific and Scenario-Shared Knowledgecited by 9
- 2023Traffic Signal Control Using Lightweight Transformers: An Offline-to-Online RL Approachcited by 3
- 2025URB -- Urban Routing Benchmark for RL-equipped Connected Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
- 2023Diverse Policy Optimization for Structured Action Spacecited by 1
- 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Joint Control of Traffic Light Signaling and Vehicle Speed Advicecited by 1
- 2025Collaboration Between the City and Machine Learning Community is Crucial to Efficient Autonomous Vehicles Routingcited by 1
- 2023Purpose in the Machine: Do Traffic Simulators Produce Distributionally Equivalent Outcomes for Reinforcement Learning Applications?cited by 0
- 2025Robustness of Reinforcement Learning-Based Traffic Signal Control under Incidents: A Comparative Studycited by 0
- 2026Generalising Travel Time Prediction To Varying Route Choices In Urban Networkscited by 0
- 2026SPADE: SPaT Attack Detection from the Connected Vehicle's Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026SPADE: SPaT Attack Detection from the Connected Vehicle's Perspective2 Sep 2026
- 2026Generalising Travel Time Prediction To Varying Route Choices In Urban Networks7 May 2026
- 2025Robustness of Reinforcement Learning-Based Traffic Signal Control under Incidents: A Comparative Study16 Jun 2025
- 2025URB -- Urban Routing Benchmark for RL-equipped Connected Autonomous Vehicles23 May 2025
- 2025Collaboration Between the City and Machine Learning Community is Crucial to Efficient Autonomous Vehicles Routing18 Feb 2025
- 2023DuaLight: Enhancing Traffic Signal Control by Leveraging Scenario-Specific and Scenario-Shared Knowledge22 Dec 2023
- 2023Traffic Signal Control Using Lightweight Transformers: An Offline-to-Online RL Approach12 Dec 2023
- 2023Purpose in the Machine: Do Traffic Simulators Produce Distributionally Equivalent Outcomes for Reinforcement Learning Applications?14 Nov 2023
- 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Joint Control of Traffic Light Signaling and Vehicle Speed Advice18 Sep 2023
- 2023Diverse Policy Optimization for Structured Action Space23 Feb 2023