On InstaHide, Phase Retrieval, and Sparse Matrix Factorization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we examine the security of InstaHide, a scheme recently proposed by [Huang, Song, Li and Arora, ICML'20] for preserving the security of private datasets in the context of distributed learning. To generate a synthetic training example to be shared among the distributed learners, InstaHide takes a convex combination of private feature vectors and randomly flips the sign of each entry of the resulting vector with probability 1/2. A salient question is whether this scheme is secure in any provable sense, perhaps under a plausible hardness assumption and assuming the distributions generating the public and private data satisfy certain properties. We show that the answer to this appears to be quite subtle and closely related to the average-case complexity of a new multi-task, missing-data version of the classic problem of phase retrieval. Motivated by this connection, we design a provable algorithm that can recover private vectors using only the public vectors and synthetic vectors generated by InstaHide, under the assumption that the private and public vectors are isotropic Gaussian.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
- 2023Federated Empirical Risk Minimization via Second-Order Methodcited by 9
- 2021Symmetric Sparse Boolean Matrix Factorization and Applicationscited by 3
- 2025Prototype Guided Backdoor Defensecited by 0
- 2025Prototype Guided Backdoor Defense26 Mar 2025
- 2023Federated Empirical Risk Minimization via Second-Order Method27 May 2023
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning30 Nov 2021
- 2021Symmetric Sparse Boolean Matrix Factorization and Applications2 Feb 2021