mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Bayesian Account of Measures of Interpretability in Human-AI Interaction

arXiv 2011.10920 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2020cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing approaches for the design of interpretable agent behavior consider different measures of interpretability in isolation. In this paper we posit that, in the design and deployment of human-aware agents in the real world, notions of interpretability are just some among many considerations; and the techniques developed in isolation lack two key properties to be useful when considered together: they need to be able to 1) deal with their mutually competing properties; and 2) an open world where the human is not just there to interpret behavior in one specific form. To this end, we consider three well-known instances of interpretable behavior studied in existing literature -- namely, explicability, legibility, and predictability -- and propose a revised model where all these behaviors can be meaningfully modeled together. We will highlight interesting consequences of this unified model and motivate, through results of a user study, why this revision is necessary.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.

4 papers.