A Bayesian Account of Measures of Interpretability in Human-AI Interaction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing approaches for the design of interpretable agent behavior consider different measures of interpretability in isolation. In this paper we posit that, in the design and deployment of human-aware agents in the real world, notions of interpretability are just some among many considerations; and the techniques developed in isolation lack two key properties to be useful when considered together: they need to be able to 1) deal with their mutually competing properties; and 2) an open world where the human is not just there to interpret behavior in one specific form. To this end, we consider three well-known instances of interpretable behavior studied in existing literature -- namely, explicability, legibility, and predictability -- and propose a revised model where all these behaviors can be meaningfully modeled together. We will highlight interesting consequences of this unified model and motivate, through results of a user study, why this revision is necessary.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021A Unifying Bayesian Formulation of Measures of Interpretability in Human-AIcited by 5
- 2021Trust-Aware Planning: Modeling Trust Evolution in Iterated Human-Robot Interactioncited by 3
- 2023A Mental Model Based Framework of Trustcited by 3
- 2021Generating Active Explicable Plans in Human-Robot Teamingcited by 2
- 2023A Mental Model Based Framework of Trust29 Jan 2023
- 2021Generating Active Explicable Plans in Human-Robot Teaming18 Sep 2021
- 2021Trust-Aware Planning: Modeling Trust Evolution in Iterated Human-Robot Interaction3 May 2021
- 2021A Unifying Bayesian Formulation of Measures of Interpretability in Human-AI21 Apr 2021