mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse sketches with small inversion bias

arXiv 2011.10695 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2020cs.DS cs.LG stat.MLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For a tall n× d matrix A and a random m× n sketching matrix S, the sketched estimate of the inverse covariance matrix (A^top A)-1 is typically biased: E[(tilde A^toptilde A)-1]ne(A^top A)-1, where tilde A=SA. This phenomenon, which we call inversion bias, arises, e.g., in statistics and distributed optimization, when averaging multiple independently constructed estimates of quantities that depend on the inverse covariance. We develop a framework for analyzing inversion bias, based on our proposed concept of an (ε,δ)-unbiased estimator for random matrices. We show that when the sketching matrix S is dense and has i.i.d. sub-gaussian entries, then after simple rescaling, the estimator (frac mm-dtilde A^toptilde A)-1 is (ε,δ)-unbiased for (A^top A)-1 with a sketch of size m=O(d+√ d/ε). This implies that for m=O(d), the inversion bias of this estimator is O(1/√ d), which is much smaller than the Theta(1) approximation error obtained as a consequence of the subspace embedding guarantee for sub-gaussian sketches. We then propose a new sketching technique, called LEverage Score Sparsified (LESS) embeddings, which uses ideas from both data-oblivious sparse embeddings as well as data-aware leverage-based row sampling methods, to get ε inversion bias for sketch size m=O(dlog d+√ d/ε) in time O(nnz(A)log n+md2), where nnz is the number of non-zeros. The key techniques enabling our analysis include an extension of a classical inequality of Bai and Silverstein for random quadratic forms, which we call the Restricted Bai-Silverstein inequality; and anti-concentration of the Binomial distribution via the Paley-Zygmund inequality, which we use to prove a lower bound showing that leverage score sampling sketches generally do not achieve small inversion bias.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Newton-LESS: Sparsification without Trade-offs for the Sketched Newton Updatecited by 23
  2. 2022Sharp Analysis of Sketch-and-Project Methods via a Connection to Randomized Singular Value Decompositioncited by 17
  3. 2022Hessian Averaging in Stochastic Newton Methods Achieves Superlinear Convergencecited by 14
  4. 2023Asymptotically free sketched ridge ensembles: Risks, cross-validation, and tuningcited by 11
  5. 2023Optimal Embedding Dimension for Sparse Subspace Embeddingscited by 11
  6. 2024Recent and Upcoming Developments in Randomized Numerical Linear Algebra for Machine Learningcited by 11
  7. 2021Accumulation of Sub-Sampling Matrices with Applications to Statistical Computationcited by 10
  8. 2022Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processescited by 10
  9. 2022Stochastic Variance-Reduced Newton: Accelerating Finite-Sum Minimization with Large Batchescited by 9
  10. 2024Fine-grained Analysis and Faster Algorithms for Iteratively Solving Linear Systemscited by 7
  11. 2022Fast Kernel Methods for Generic Lipschitz Losses via p-Sparsified Sketchescited by 5
  12. 2022Algorithmic Gaussianization through Sketching: Converting Data into Sub-gaussian Random Designscited by 4
7 more
  1. 2024Faster Linear Systems and Matrix Norm Approximation via Multi-level Sketched Preconditioningcited by 4
  2. 2024Optimal Oblivious Subspace Embeddings with Near-optimal Sparsitycited by 4
  3. 2024Distributed Least Squares in Small Space via Sketching and Bias Reductioncited by 3
  4. 2025Fundamental Bias in Inverting Random Sampling Matrices with Application to Sub-sampled Newtoncited by 1
  5. 2021Learning Linear Models Using Distributed Iterative Hessian Sketchingcited by 0
  6. 2023Linear Convergence of Reshuffling Kaczmarz Methods With Sparse Constraintscited by 0
  7. 2026The Advantages of Fresh Sketching for Ridge Regressioncited by 0