Towards evaluating and eliciting high-quality documentation for intelligent systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A vital component of trust and transparency in intelligent systems built on machine learning and artificial intelligence is the development of clear, understandable documentation. However, such systems are notorious for their complexity and opaqueness making quality documentation a non-trivial task. Furthermore, little is known about what makes such documentation "good." In this paper, we propose and evaluate a set of quality dimensions to identify in what ways this type of documentation falls short. Then, using those dimensions, we evaluate three different approaches for eliciting intelligent system documentation. We show how the dimensions identify shortcomings in such documentation and posit how such dimensions can be use to further enable users to provide documentation that is suitable to a given persona or use case.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2022Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Designcited by 47
- 2023A Meta-Summary of Challenges in Building Products with ML Components -- Collecting Experiences from 4758+ Practitionerscited by 22
- 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smellscited by 8
- 2022Evaluating a Methodology for Increasing AI Transparency: A Case Studycited by 3
- 2026Promoting Critical Thinking With Domain-Specific Generative AI Provocationscited by 0
- 2026Automatic Model Card Generation Using an LLMcited by 0
- 2026Automatic Model Card Generation Using an LLM25 Aug 2026
- 2026Promoting Critical Thinking With Domain-Specific Generative AI Provocations20 Mar 2026
- 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smells29 Sep 2024
- 2023A Meta-Summary of Challenges in Building Products with ML Components -- Collecting Experiences from 4758+ Practitioners31 Mar 2023
- 2022Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Design10 Feb 2022
- 2022Evaluating a Methodology for Increasing AI Transparency: A Case Study24 Jan 2022
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices4 Oct 2021