mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Good proctor or "Big Brother"? AI Ethics and Online Exam Supervision Technologies

arXiv 2011.07647 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2020cs.CY cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article philosophically analyzes online exam supervision technologies, which have been thrust into the public spotlight due to campus lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing demand for online courses. Online exam proctoring technologies purport to provide effective oversight of students sitting online exams, using artificial intelligence (AI) systems and human invigilators to supplement and review those systems. Such technologies have alarmed some students who see them as `Big Brother-like', yet some universities defend their judicious use. Critical ethical appraisal of online proctoring technologies is overdue. This article philosophically analyzes these technologies, focusing on the ethical concepts of academic integrity, fairness, non-maleficence, transparency, privacy, respect for autonomy, liberty, and trust. Most of these concepts are prominent in the new field of AI ethics and all are relevant to the education context. The essay provides ethical considerations that educational institutions will need to carefully review before electing to deploy and govern specific online proctoring technologies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.