An example of prediction which complies with Demographic Parity and equalizes group-wise risks in the context of regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Let (X, S, Y) ∈ ℝp × 1, 2 × ℝ be a triplet following some joint distribution mathbbP with feature vector X, sensitive attribute S , and target variable Y. The Bayes optimal prediction f^* which does not produce Disparate Treatment is defined as f^*(x) = mathbbE[Y | X = x]. We provide a non-trivial example of a prediction x → f(x) which satisfies two common group-fairness notions: Demographic Parity beginalign (f(X) | S = 1) &stackreld= (f(X) | S = 2) endalign and Equal Group-Wise Risks beginalign mathbbE[(f^*(X) - f(X))2 | S = 1] = mathbbE[(f^*(X) - f(X))2 | S = 2]. endalign To the best of our knowledge this is the first explicit construction of a non-constant predictor satisfying the above. We discuss several implications of this result on better understanding of mathematical notions of algorithmic fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteriacited by 34
- 2022Fair learning with Wasserstein barycenters for non-decomposable performance measurescited by 24
- 2024Regression under demographic parity constraints via unlabeled post-processingcited by 5
- 2024Demographic parity in regression and classification within the unawareness frameworkcited by 2
- 2024Demographic parity in regression and classification within the unawareness framework4 Sep 2024
- 2024Regression under demographic parity constraints via unlabeled post-processing22 Jul 2024
- 2022Fair learning with Wasserstein barycenters for non-decomposable performance measures1 Sep 2022
- 2021Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteria28 Oct 2021