mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How to Measure Gender Bias in Machine Translation: Optimal Translators, Multiple Reference Points

arXiv 2011.06445 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2020stat.ML cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, as a case study, we present a systematic study of gender bias in machine translation with Google Translate. We translated sentences containing names of occupations from Hungarian, a language with gender-neutral pronouns, into English. Our aim was to present a fair measure for bias by comparing the translations to an optimal non-biased translator. When assessing bias, we used the following reference points: (1) the distribution of men and women among occupations in both the source and the target language countries, as well as (2) the results of a Hungarian survey that examined if certain jobs are generally perceived as feminine or masculine. We also studied how expanding sentences with adjectives referring to occupations effect the gender of the translated pronouns. As a result, we found bias against both genders, but biased results against women are much more frequent. Translations are closer to our perception of occupations than to objective occupational statistics. Finally, occupations have a greater effect on translation than adjectives.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.

3 papers.