When Does Uncertainty Matter?: Understanding the Impact of Predictive Uncertainty in ML Assisted Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being employed to assist human decision makers, it becomes critical to provide these decision makers with relevant inputs which can help them decide if and how to incorporate model predictions into their decision making. For instance, communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions could potentially be helpful in this regard. In this work, we carry out user studies (1,330 responses from 190 participants) to systematically assess how people with differing levels of expertise respond to different types of predictive uncertainty (i.e., posterior predictive distributions with different shapes and variances) in the context of ML assisted decision making for predicting apartment rental prices. We found that showing posterior predictive distributions led to smaller disagreements with the ML model's predictions, regardless of the shapes and variances of the posterior predictive distributions we considered, and that these effects may be sensitive to expertise in both ML and the domain. This suggests that posterior predictive distributions can potentially serve as useful decision aids which should be used with caution and take into account the type of distribution and the expertise of the human.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 85
- 2022Predictive Multiplicity in Probabilistic Classificationcited by 44
- 2021Uncertainty Estimation and Out-of-Distribution Detection for Counterfactual Explanations: Pitfalls and Solutionscited by 16
- 2022Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-makingcited by 14
- 2022Algorithmic Assistance with Recommendation-Dependent Preferencescited by 11
- 2023Identifying Drivers of Predictive Aleatoric Uncertaintycited by 4
- 2024Uncertainty Quantification for Neurosymbolic Programs via Compositional Conformal Predictioncited by 4
- 2022Expanding Knowledge Graphs with Humans in the Loopcited by 3
- 2021Generating and Evaluating Explanations of Attended and Error-Inducing Input Regions for VQA Modelscited by 2
- 2022Doubting AI Predictions: Influence-Driven Second Opinion Recommendationcited by 2
- 2025The potential -- and the pitfalls -- of using pre-trained language models as cognitive science theoriescited by 2
- 2024Underspecified Human Decision Experiments Considered Harmfulcited by 0
- 2025The potential -- and the pitfalls -- of using pre-trained language models as cognitive science theories22 Jan 2025
- 2024Uncertainty Quantification for Neurosymbolic Programs via Compositional Conformal Prediction24 May 2024
- 2024Underspecified Human Decision Experiments Considered Harmful25 Jan 2024
- 2023Identifying Drivers of Predictive Aleatoric Uncertainty12 Dec 2023
- 2022Expanding Knowledge Graphs with Humans in the Loop10 Dec 2022
- 2022Algorithmic Assistance with Recommendation-Dependent Preferences16 Aug 2022
- 2022Predictive Multiplicity in Probabilistic Classification2 Jun 2022
- 2022Doubting AI Predictions: Influence-Driven Second Opinion Recommendation29 Apr 2022
- 2022Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-making11 Apr 2022
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies21 Dec 2021
- 2021Uncertainty Estimation and Out-of-Distribution Detection for Counterfactual Explanations: Pitfalls and Solutions20 Jul 2021
- 2021Generating and Evaluating Explanations of Attended and Error-Inducing Input Regions for VQA Models26 Mar 2021