mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Colorado in Context: Congressional Redistricting and Competing Fairness Criteria in Colorado

arXiv 2011.06049 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2020cs.CY physics.soc-ph stat.APcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we apply techniques of ensemble analysis to understand the political baseline for Congressional representation in Colorado. We generate a large random sample of reasonable redistricting plans and determine the partisan balance of each district using returns from state-wide elections in 2018, and analyze the 2011/2012 enacted districts in this context. Colorado recently adopted a new framework for redistricting, creating an independent commission to draw district boundaries, prohibiting partisan bias and incumbency considerations, requiring that political boundaries (such as counties) be preserved as much as possible, and also requiring that mapmakers maximize the number of competitive districts. We investigate the relationships between partisan outcomes, number of counties which are split, and number of competitive districts in a plan. This paper also features two novel improvements in methodology--a more rigorous statistical framework for understanding necessary sample size, and a weighted-graph method for generating random plans which split approximately as few counties as acceptable human-drawn maps.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.