Ridge Regression with Frequent Directions: Statistical and Optimization Perspectives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite its impressive theory & practical performance, Frequent Directions (acrshortfd) has not been widely adopted for large-scale regression tasks. Prior work has shown randomized sketches (i) perform worse in estimating the covariance matrix of the data than acrshortfd; (ii) incur high error when estimating the bias and/or variance on sketched ridge regression. We give the first constant factor relative error bounds on the bias & variance for sketched ridge regression using acrshortfd. We complement these statistical results by showing that acrshortfd can be used in the optimization setting through an iterative scheme which yields high-accuracy solutions. This improves on randomized approaches which need to compromise the need for a new sketch every iteration with speed of convergence. In both settings, we also show using Robust Frequent Directions further enhances performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Optimal Matrix Sketching over Sliding Windowscited by 3
- 2024Optimal Matrix Sketching over Sliding Windows13 May 2024