In the Beginning there were n Agents: Founding and Amending a Constitution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider n agents forming an egalitarian, self-governed community. Their first task is to decide on a decision rule to make further decisions. We start from a rather general initial agreement on the decision-making process based upon a set of intuitive and self-evident axioms, as well as simplifying assumptions about the preferences of the agents. From these humble beginnings we derive a decision rule. Crucially, the decision rule also specifies how it can be changed, or amended, and thus acts as a de facto constitution. Our main contribution is in providing an example of an initial agreement that is simple and intuitive, and a constitution that logically follows from it. The naive agreement is on the basic process of decision making - that agents approve or disapprove proposals; that their vote determines either the acceptance or rejection of each proposal; and on the axioms, which are requirements regarding a constitution that engenders a self-updating decision making process.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Foundations for Grassroots Democratic Metaversecited by 3
- 2022Social Mechanism Design: Making Maximally Acceptable Decisionscited by 0
- 2026Constitutional Governance in Metric Spacescited by 0
- 2026Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces13 May 2026
- 2022Social Mechanism Design: Making Maximally Acceptable Decisions15 Nov 2022
- 2022Foundations for Grassroots Democratic Metaverse2 Mar 2022