mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithms and Hardness for Linear Algebra on Geometric Graphs

arXiv 2011.02466 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2020cs.DS cs.CC cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For a function mathsfK : ℝd × ℝd → ℝ≥ 0, and a set P = x1, ldots, xn subset ℝd of n points, the mathsfK graph GP of P is the complete graph on n nodes where the weight between nodes i and j is given by mathsfK(xi, xj). In this paper, we initiate the study of when efficient spectral graph theory is possible on these graphs. We investigate whether or not it is possible to solve the following problems in n1+o(1) time for a mathsfK-graph GP when d < no(1): bullet Multiply a given vector by the adjacency matrix or Laplacian matrix of GP bullet Find a spectral sparsifier of GP bullet Solve a Laplacian system in GP's Laplacian matrix For each of these problems, we consider all functions of the form mathsfK(u,v) = f(|u-v|22) for a function f:ℝ rightarrow ℝ. We provide algorithms and comparable hardness results for many such mathsfK, including the Gaussian kernel, Neural tangent kernels, and more. For example, in dimension d = Omega(log n), we show that there is a parameter associated with the function f for which low parameter values imply n1+o(1) time algorithms for all three of these problems and high parameter values imply the nonexistence of subquadratic time algorithms assuming Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (mathsfSETH), given natural assumptions on f. As part of our results, we also show that the exponential dependence on the dimension d in the celebrated fast multipole method of Greengard and Rokhlin cannot be improved, assuming mathsfSETH, for a broad class of functions f. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first formal limitation proven about fast multipole methods.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 10; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Fast Attention Requires Bounded Entriescited by 102
  2. 2023How to Capture Higher-order Correlations? Generalizing Matrix Softmax Attention to Kronecker Computationcited by 44
  3. 2021Fast Sketching of Polynomial Kernels of Polynomial Degreecited by 33
  4. 2024Computational Limits of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) Fine-Tuning for Transformer Modelscited by 31
  5. 2024The Fine-Grained Complexity of Gradient Computation for Training Large Language Modelscited by 30
  6. 2022Bypass Exponential Time Preprocessing: Fast Neural Network Training via Weight-Data Correlation Preprocessingcited by 29
  7. 2024Training Tensor Attention Efficiently: From Cubic to Almost Linear Timecited by 29
  8. 2023Why Softmax Attention Outperforms Linear Attentioncited by 15
  9. 2023Fast Private Kernel Density Estimation via Locality Sensitive Quantizationcited by 7
  10. 2023The complexity of non-stationary reinforcement learningcited by 7
  11. 2022Dynamic Maintenance of Kernel Density Estimation Data Structure: From Practice to Theorycited by 6
  12. 2023Streaming Kernel PCA Algorithm With Small Spacecited by 5
10 more
  1. 2025The Structural Complexity of Matrix-Vector Multiplicationcited by 4
  2. 2023Fast Approximation of Similarity Graphs with Kernel Density Estimationcited by 3
  3. 2023Hardness of Low Rank Approximation of Entrywise Transformed Matrix Productscited by 3
  4. 2022The Complexity of Dynamic Least-Squares Regressioncited by 2
  5. 2022Sub-quadratic Algorithms for Kernel Matrices via Kernel Density Estimationcited by 2
  6. 2024Differentially Private Kernel Density Estimationcited by 2
  7. 2025Even Faster Kernel Matrix Linear Algebra via Density Estimationcited by 1
  8. 2023Graph Enabled Cross-Domain Knowledge Transfercited by 0
  9. 2023Spectral Clustering on Large Datasets: When Does it Work? Theory from Continuous Clustering and Density Cheeger-Busercited by 0
  10. 2026Tracking High-order Evolutions via Cascading Low-rank Fittingcited by 0