Evolving test instances of the Hamiltonian completion problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predicting and comparing algorithm performance on graph instances is challenging for multiple reasons. First, there is usually no standard set of instances to benchmark performance. Second, using existing graph generators results in a restricted spectrum of difficulty and the resulting graphs are usually not diverse enough to draw sound conclusions. That is why recent work proposes a new methodology to generate a diverse set of instances by using an evolutionary algorithm. We can then analyze the resulting graphs and get key insights into which attributes are most related to algorithm performance. We can also fill observed gaps in the instance space in order to generate graphs with previously unseen combinations of features. This methodology is applied to the instance space of the Hamiltonian completion problem using two different solvers, namely the Concorde TSP Solver and a multi-start local search algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023MA-BBOB: Many-Affine Combinations of BBOB Functions for Evaluating AutoML Approaches in Noiseless Numerical Black-Box Optimization Contextscited by 7
- 2024Evolving Benchmark Functions to Compare Evolutionary Algorithms via Genetic Programmingcited by 2
- 2026An Evolutionary Framework for Automatic Optimization Benchmark Generation via Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026An Evolutionary Framework for Automatic Optimization Benchmark Generation via Large Language Models19 Jan 2026
- 2024Evolving Benchmark Functions to Compare Evolutionary Algorithms via Genetic Programming21 Mar 2024
- 2023MA-BBOB: Many-Affine Combinations of BBOB Functions for Evaluating AutoML Approaches in Noiseless Numerical Black-Box Optimization Contexts18 Jun 2023