Learning in the Wild with Incremental Skeptical Gaussian Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability to learn from human supervision is fundamental for personal assistants and other interactive applications of AI. Two central challenges for deploying interactive learners in the wild are the unreliable nature of the supervision and the varying complexity of the prediction task. We address a simple but representative setting, incremental classification in the wild, where the supervision is noisy and the number of classes grows over time. In order to tackle this task, we propose a redesign of skeptical learning centered around Gaussian Processes (GPs). Skeptical learning is a recent interactive strategy in which, if the machine is sufficiently confident that an example is mislabeled, it asks the annotator to reconsider her feedback. In many cases, this is often enough to obtain clean supervision. Our redesign, dubbed ISGP, leverages the uncertainty estimates supplied by GPs to better allocate labeling and contradiction queries, especially in the presence of noise. Our experiments on synthetic and real-world data show that, as a result, while the original formulation of skeptical learning produces over-confident models that can fail completely in the wild, ISGP works well at varying levels of noise and as new classes are observed.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overviewcited by 52
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 48
- 2022Estimating the Contamination Factor's Distribution in Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 14
- 2021Human-in-the-loop Handling of Knowledge Driftcited by 4
- 2023Online Decision Mediationcited by 4
- 2022Efficient and Reliable Probabilistic Interactive Learning with Structured Outputscited by 2
- 2022Lifelong Personal Context Recognitioncited by 2
- 2021Streaming and Learning the Personal Contextcited by 1
- 2023Factors Impacting the Quality of User Answers on Smartphonescited by 0
- 2024Bridging the Gap in Hybrid Decision-Making Systemscited by 0
- 2025A Frank System for Co-Evolutionary Hybrid Decision-Makingcited by 0
- 2025Help the machine to help you: an evaluation in the wild of egocentric data cleaning via skeptical learningcited by 0
- 2025Help the machine to help you: an evaluation in the wild of egocentric data cleaning via skeptical learning24 Oct 2025
- 2025A Frank System for Co-Evolutionary Hybrid Decision-Making8 Mar 2025
- 2024Bridging the Gap in Hybrid Decision-Making Systems28 Sep 2024
- 2023Online Decision Mediation28 Oct 2023
- 2023Factors Impacting the Quality of User Answers on Smartphones1 Jun 2023
- 2022Estimating the Contamination Factor's Distribution in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection19 Oct 2022
- 2022Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overview29 Jul 2022
- 2022Lifelong Personal Context Recognition10 May 2022
- 2022Efficient and Reliable Probabilistic Interactive Learning with Structured Outputs17 Feb 2022
- 2021Streaming and Learning the Personal Context18 Aug 2021
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanations7 Jun 2021
- 2021Human-in-the-loop Handling of Knowledge Drift27 Mar 2021