mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aggregating Incomplete and Noisy Rankings

arXiv 2011.00810 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of learning the true ordering of a set of alternatives from largely incomplete and noisy rankings. We introduce a natural generalization of both the classical Mallows model of ranking distributions and the extensively studied model of noisy pairwise comparisons. Our selective Mallows model outputs a noisy ranking on any given subset of alternatives, based on an underlying Mallows distribution. Assuming a sequence of subsets where each pair of alternatives appears frequently enough, we obtain strong asymptotically tight upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity of learning the underlying complete ranking and the (identities and the) ranking of the top-k alternatives from selective Mallows rankings. Moreover, building on the work of (Braverman and Mossel, 2009), we show how to efficiently compute the maximum likelihood complete ranking from selective Mallows rankings.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.