Reducing Confusion in Active Learning for Part-Of-Speech Tagging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning (AL) uses a data selection algorithm to select useful training samples to minimize annotation cost. This is now an essential tool for building low-resource syntactic analyzers such as part-of-speech (POS) taggers. Existing AL heuristics are generally designed on the principle of selecting uncertain yet representative training instances, where annotating these instances may reduce a large number of errors. However, in an empirical study across six typologically diverse languages (German, Swedish, Galician, North Sami, Persian, and Ukrainian), we found the surprising result that even in an oracle scenario where we know the true uncertainty of predictions, these current heuristics are far from optimal. Based on this analysis, we pose the problem of AL as selecting instances which maximally reduce the confusion between particular pairs of output tags. Extensive experimentation on the aforementioned languages shows that our proposed AL strategy outperforms other AL strategies by a significant margin. We also present auxiliary results demonstrating the importance of proper calibration of models, which we ensure through cross-view training, and analysis demonstrating how our proposed strategy selects examples that more closely follow the oracle data distribution.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
- 2023D-CALM: A Dynamic Clustering-based Active Learning Approach for Mitigating Biascited by 12
- 2024The Zeno's Paradox of `Low-Resource' Languagescited by 12
- 2023On the Limitations of Simulating Active Learningcited by 9
- 2023Investigating Multi-source Active Learning for Natural Language Inferencecited by 6
- 2024ARAIDA: Analogical Reasoning-Augmented Interactive Data Annotationcited by 6
- 2022Language Varieties of Italy: Technology Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 1
- 2022High-Resource Methodological Bias in Low-Resource Investigationscited by 1
- 2025Unveiling Factors for Enhanced POS Tagging: A Study of Low-Resource Medieval Romance Languagescited by 1
- 2024Surfing the modeling of PoS taggers in low-resource scenarioscited by 0
- 2024Active Learning with Task Adaptation Pre-training for Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025Unveiling Factors for Enhanced POS Tagging: A Study of Low-Resource Medieval Romance Languages21 Jun 2025
- 2024The Zeno's Paradox of `Low-Resource' Languages28 Oct 2024
- 2024ARAIDA: Analogical Reasoning-Augmented Interactive Data Annotation20 May 2024
- 2024Active Learning with Task Adaptation Pre-training for Speech Emotion Recognition1 May 2024
- 2024Surfing the modeling of PoS taggers in low-resource scenarios4 Feb 2024
- 2023D-CALM: A Dynamic Clustering-based Active Learning Approach for Mitigating Bias26 May 2023
- 2023On the Limitations of Simulating Active Learning21 May 2023
- 2023Investigating Multi-source Active Learning for Natural Language Inference14 Feb 2023
- 2022High-Resource Methodological Bias in Low-Resource Investigations14 Nov 2022
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processing18 Oct 2022
- 2022Language Varieties of Italy: Technology Challenges and Opportunities20 Sep 2022