Sequence-to-Sequence Networks Learn the Meaning of Reflexive Anaphora
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reflexive anaphora present a challenge for semantic interpretation: their meaning varies depending on context in a way that appears to require abstract variables. Past work has raised doubts about the ability of recurrent networks to meet this challenge. In this paper, we explore this question in the context of a fragment of English that incorporates the relevant sort of contextual variability. We consider sequence-to-sequence architectures with recurrent units and show that such networks are capable of learning semantic interpretations for reflexive anaphora which generalize to novel antecedents. We explore the effect of attention mechanisms and different recurrent unit types on the type of training data that is needed for success as measured in two ways: how much lexical support is needed to induce an abstract reflexive meaning (i.e., how many distinct reflexive antecedents must occur during training) and what contexts must a noun phrase occur in to support generalization of reflexive interpretation to this noun phrase?
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
- 2021Transformers Generalize Linearlycited by 19
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and review6 Oct 2022
- 2021Transformers Generalize Linearly24 Sep 2021