Learning Stable Normalizing-Flow Control for Robotic Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning (RL) of robotic manipulation skills, despite its impressive successes, stands to benefit from incorporating domain knowledge from control theory. One of the most important properties that is of interest is control stability. Ideally, one would like to achieve stability guarantees while staying within the framework of state-of-the-art deep RL algorithms. Such a solution does not exist in general, especially one that scales to complex manipulation tasks. We contribute towards closing this gap by introducing textitnormalizing-flow control structure, that can be deployed in any latest deep RL algorithms. While stable exploration is not guaranteed, our method is designed to ultimately produce deterministic controllers with provable stability. In addition to demonstrating our method on challenging contact-rich manipulation tasks, we also show that it is possible to achieve considerable exploration efficiency--reduced state space coverage and actuation efforts--without losing learning efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2024Riemannian Flow Matching Policy for Robot Motion Learningcited by 61
- 2024Fast and Robust Visuomotor Riemannian Flow Matching Policycited by 18
- 2023Generative Modelling of Stochastic Actions with Arbitrary Constraints in Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2022Multiscale Sensor Fusion and Continuous Control with Neural CDEscited by 4
- 2022CEIP: Combining Explicit and Implicit Priors for Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 4
- 2026SERNF: Sample-Efficient Real-World Dexterous Policy Fine-Tuning via Action-Chunked Critics and Normalizing Flowscited by 2
- 2025Data-driven identification of nonlinear dynamical systems with LSTM autoencoders and Normalizing Flowscited by 1
- 2026Issues with Measuring Task Complexity via Random Policies in Robotic Taskscited by 0
- 2026Potential-Field Action Representation for Reinforcement Learning in Contact-Rich Manipulationcited by 0
- 2026Potential-Field Action Representation for Reinforcement Learning in Contact-Rich Manipulation18 Sep 2026
- 2026Issues with Measuring Task Complexity via Random Policies in Robotic Tasks21 Feb 2026
- 2026SERNF: Sample-Efficient Real-World Dexterous Policy Fine-Tuning via Action-Chunked Critics and Normalizing Flows10 Feb 2026
- 2025Data-driven identification of nonlinear dynamical systems with LSTM autoencoders and Normalizing Flows5 Mar 2025
- 2024Fast and Robust Visuomotor Riemannian Flow Matching Policy14 Dec 2024
- 2024Riemannian Flow Matching Policy for Robot Motion Learning15 Mar 2024
- 2023Generative Modelling of Stochastic Actions with Arbitrary Constraints in Reinforcement Learning26 Nov 2023
- 2022CEIP: Combining Explicit and Implicit Priors for Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrations18 Oct 2022
- 2022Multiscale Sensor Fusion and Continuous Control with Neural CDEs16 Mar 2022