mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Strongly Incremental Constituency Parsing with Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2010.14568 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2020cs.CLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Parsing sentences into syntax trees can benefit downstream applications in NLP. Transition-based parsers build trees by executing actions in a state transition system. They are computationally efficient, and can leverage machine learning to predict actions based on partial trees. However, existing transition-based parsers are predominantly based on the shift-reduce transition system, which does not align with how humans are known to parse sentences. Psycholinguistic research suggests that human parsing is strongly incremental: humans grow a single parse tree by adding exactly one token at each step. In this paper, we propose a novel transition system called attach-juxtapose. It is strongly incremental; it represents a partial sentence using a single tree; each action adds exactly one token into the partial tree. Based on our transition system, we develop a strongly incremental parser. At each step, it encodes the partial tree using a graph neural network and predicts an action. We evaluate our parser on Penn Treebank (PTB) and Chinese Treebank (CTB). On PTB, it outperforms existing parsers trained with only constituency trees; and it performs on par with state-of-the-art parsers that use dependency trees as additional training data. On CTB, our parser establishes a new state of the art. Code is available at https://github.com/princeton-vl/attach-juxtapose-parser.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 6; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
  2. 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
  3. 2021Bottom-Up Constituency Parsing and Nested Named Entity Recognition with Pointer Networkscited by 21
  4. 2021Linguistic Frameworks Go Toe-to-Toe at Neuro-Symbolic Language Modelingcited by 10
  5. 2022A Double-Graph Based Framework for Frame Semantic Parsingcited by 10
  6. 2024Explainable Natural Language Processing for Corporate Sustainability Analysiscited by 9
  7. 2021Reducing Discontinuous to Continuous Parsing with Pointer Network Reorderingcited by 5
  8. 2021Discontinuous Grammar as a Foreign Languagecited by 4
  9. 2023Efficient Encoders for Streaming Sequence Taggingcited by 4
  10. 2023On the Challenges of Fully Incremental Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 2
  11. 2023Constituency Parsing using LLMscited by 2
  12. 2024To be Continuous, or to be Discrete, Those are Bits of Questionscited by 2
11 more
  1. 2024An Attempt to Develop a Neural Parser based on Simplified Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar on Vietnamesecited by 2
  2. 2021Neural Combinatory Constituency Parsingcited by 1
  3. 2022Fast Rule-Based Decoding: Revisiting Syntactic Rules in Neural Constituency Parsingcited by 1
  4. 2023Structured Sentiment Analysis as Transition-based Dependency Graph Parsingcited by 1
  5. 2024From Partial to Strictly Incremental Constituent Parsingcited by 1
  6. 2021Graph Neural Networks for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 0
  7. 2023Analyzing Vietnamese Legal Questions Using Deep Neural Networks with Biaffine Classifierscited by 0
  8. 2023Strahler Number of Natural Language Sentences in Comparison with Random Treescited by 0
  9. 2024Entity-Aware Biaffine Attention Model for Improved Constituent Parsing with Reduced Entity Violationscited by 0
  10. 2024Train Once for All: A Transitional Approach for Efficient Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extractioncited by 0
  11. 2026Exploiting Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Transformers for Sequence-to-Sequence Constituent Parsingcited by 0