The Teaching Dimension of Kernel Perceptron
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic machine teaching has been studied under the linear setting where exact teaching is possible. However, little is known for teaching nonlinear learners. Here, we establish the sample complexity of teaching, aka teaching dimension, for kernelized perceptrons for different families of feature maps. As a warm-up, we show that the teaching complexity is Theta(d) for the exact teaching of linear perceptrons in ℝd, and Theta(dk) for kernel perceptron with a polynomial kernel of order k. Furthermore, under certain smooth assumptions on the data distribution, we establish a rigorous bound on the complexity for approximately teaching a Gaussian kernel perceptron. We provide numerical examples of the optimal (approximate) teaching set under several canonical settings for linear, polynomial and Gaussian kernel perceptrons.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
5 papers.
- 2021Teaching Humans When To Defer to a Classifier via Exemplarscited by 29
- 2021Iterative Teaching by Label Synthesiscited by 10
- 2023Nonparametric Iterative Machine Teachingcited by 9
- 2022Iterative Teaching by Data Hallucinationcited by 8
- 2023Nonparametric Teaching for Multiple Learnerscited by 7
- 2023Nonparametric Teaching for Multiple Learners17 Nov 2023
- 2023Nonparametric Iterative Machine Teaching5 Jun 2023
- 2022Iterative Teaching by Data Hallucination31 Oct 2022
- 2021Teaching Humans When To Defer to a Classifier via Exemplars22 Nov 2021
- 2021Iterative Teaching by Label Synthesis27 Oct 2021