mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What is the best data augmentation for 3D brain tumor segmentation?

arXiv 2010.13372 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2020eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training segmentation networks requires large annotated datasets, which in medical imaging can be hard to obtain. Despite this fact, data augmentation has in our opinion not been fully explored for brain tumor segmentation. In this project we apply different types of data augmentation (flipping, rotation, scaling, brightness adjustment, elastic deformation) when training a standard 3D U-Net, and demonstrate that augmentation significantly improves the network's performance in many cases. Our conclusion is that brightness augmentation and elastic deformation work best, and that combinations of different augmentation techniques do not provide further improvement compared to only using one augmentation technique. Our code is available at https://github.com/mdciri/3D-augmentation-techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.