ATRO: Adversarial Training with a Rejection Option
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper proposes a classification framework with a rejection option to mitigate the performance deterioration caused by adversarial examples. While recent machine learning algorithms achieve high prediction performance, they are empirically vulnerable to adversarial examples, which are slightly perturbed data samples that are wrongly classified. In real-world applications, adversarial attacks using such adversarial examples could cause serious problems. To this end, various methods are proposed to obtain a classifier that is robust against adversarial examples. Adversarial training is one of them, which trains a classifier to minimize the worst-case loss under adversarial attacks. In this paper, in order to acquire a more reliable classifier against adversarial attacks, we propose the method of Adversarial Training with a Rejection Option (ATRO). Applying the adversarial training objective to both a classifier and a rejection function simultaneously, classifiers trained by ATRO can choose to abstain from classification when it has insufficient confidence to classify a test data point. We examine the feasibility of the framework using the surrogate maximum hinge loss and establish a generalization bound for linear models. Furthermore, we empirically confirmed the effectiveness of ATRO using various models and real-world datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 107
- 2021Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples Apartcited by 14
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 8
- 2023Stratified Adversarial Robustness with Rejectioncited by 4
- 2022A Case for Rejection in Low Resource ML Deploymentcited by 2
- 2024Adversarial Consistency and the Uniqueness of the Adversarial Bayes Classifiercited by 2
- 2023Two Heads are Actually Better than One: Towards Better Adversarial Robustness via Transduction and Rejectioncited by 0
- 2024Towards Calibrated Losses for Adversarial Robust Reject Option Classificationcited by 0
- 2024Towards Calibrated Losses for Adversarial Robust Reject Option Classification14 Oct 2024
- 2024Adversarial Consistency and the Uniqueness of the Adversarial Bayes Classifier26 Apr 2024
- 2023Two Heads are Actually Better than One: Towards Better Adversarial Robustness via Transduction and Rejection27 May 2023
- 2023Stratified Adversarial Robustness with Rejection2 May 2023
- 2022A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunities17 Oct 2022
- 2022A Case for Rejection in Low Resource ML Deployment12 Aug 2022
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A survey23 Jul 2021
- 2021Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples Apart31 May 2021