mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Passage Retrieval with Improved Negative Contrast

arXiv 2010.12523 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2020cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we explore the effects of negative sampling in dual encoder models used to retrieve passages for automatic question answering. We explore four negative sampling strategies that complement the straightforward random sampling of negatives, typically used to train dual encoder models. Out of the four strategies, three are based on retrieval and one on heuristics. Our retrieval-based strategies are based on the semantic similarity and the lexical overlap between questions and passages. We train the dual encoder models in two stages: pre-training with synthetic data and fine tuning with domain-specific data. We apply negative sampling to both stages. The approach is evaluated in two passage retrieval tasks. Even though it is not evident that there is one single sampling strategy that works best in all the tasks, it is clear that our strategies contribute to improving the contrast between the response and all the other passages. Furthermore, mixing the negatives from different strategies achieve performance on par with the best performing strategy in all tasks. Our results establish a new state-of-the-art level of performance on two of the open-domain question answering datasets that we evaluated.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

11 papers.