mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Importance Reweighting for Biquality Learning

arXiv 2010.09621 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2020cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The field of Weakly Supervised Learning (WSL) has recently seen a surge of popularity, with numerous papers addressing different types of "supervision deficiencies", namely: poor quality, non adaptability, and insufficient quantity of labels. Regarding quality, label noise can be of different types, including completely-at-random, at-random or even not-at-random. All these kinds of label noise are addressed separately in the literature, leading to highly specialized approaches. This paper proposes an original, encompassing, view of Weakly Supervised Learning, which results in the design of generic approaches capable of dealing with any kind of label noise. For this purpose, an alternative setting called "Biquality data" is used. It assumes that a small trusted dataset of correctly labeled examples is available, in addition to an untrusted dataset of noisy examples. In this paper, we propose a new reweigthing scheme capable of identifying noncorrupted examples in the untrusted dataset. This allows one to learn classifiers using both datasets. Extensive experiments that simulate several types of label noise and that vary the quality and quantity of untrusted examples, demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms baselines and state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

4 papers.