Aerodynamic Data Predictions Based on Multi-task Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The quality of datasets is one of the key factors that affect the accuracy of aerodynamic data models. For example, in the uniformly sampled Burgers' dataset, the insufficient high-speed data is overwhelmed by massive low-speed data. Predicting high-speed data is more difficult than predicting low-speed data, owing to that the number of high-speed data is limited, i.e. the quality of the Burgers' dataset is not satisfactory. To improve the quality of datasets, traditional methods usually employ the data resampling technology to produce enough data for the insufficient parts in the original datasets before modeling, which increases computational costs. Recently, the mixtures of experts have been used in natural language processing to deal with different parts of sentences, which provides a solution for eliminating the need for data resampling in aerodynamic data modeling. Motivated by this, we propose the multi-task learning (MTL), a datasets quality-adaptive learning scheme, which combines task allocation and aerodynamic characteristics learning together to disperse the pressure of the entire learning task. The task allocation divides a whole learning task into several independent subtasks, while the aerodynamic characteristics learning learns these subtasks simultaneously to achieve better precision. Two experiments with poor quality datasets are conducted to verify the data quality-adaptivity of the MTL to datasets. The results show than the MTL is more accurate than FCNs and GANs in poor quality datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Predictioncited by 4
- 2022A Manifold-based Airfoil Geometric-feature Extraction and Discrepant Data Fusion Learning Methodcited by 3
- 2022A Multi-Characteristic Learning Method with Micro-Doppler Signatures for Pedestrian Identificationcited by 1
- 2023Novel deep learning methods for 3D flow field segmentation and classificationcited by 0
- 2023Learning with Geometry: Including Riemannian Geometric Features in Coefficient of Pressure Prediction on Aircraft Wingscited by 0
- 2026LGFNet: Local-Global Fusion Network with Fidelity Gap Delta Learning for Multi-Source Aerodynamicscited by 0
- 2026LGFNet: Local-Global Fusion Network with Fidelity Gap Delta Learning for Multi-Source Aerodynamics31 Mar 2026
- 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Prediction6 Jun 2024
- 2023Learning with Geometry: Including Riemannian Geometric Features in Coefficient of Pressure Prediction on Aircraft Wings22 Dec 2023
- 2023Novel deep learning methods for 3D flow field segmentation and classification10 May 2023
- 2022A Manifold-based Airfoil Geometric-feature Extraction and Discrepant Data Fusion Learning Method23 Jun 2022
- 2022A Multi-Characteristic Learning Method with Micro-Doppler Signatures for Pedestrian Identification23 Mar 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025BlendedNet++: A dataset and benchmark for field-resolved aerodynamics and inverse design of blended wing body aircraft
- 2025A Mixture of Experts Gating Network for Enhanced Surrogate Modeling in External Aerodynamics
- 2025Improving Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding for Flow Field Data
- 2025Flow to Learn: Flow Matching on Neural Network Parameters
- 2026Knowledge-Constrained Shape Optimization with a Mixture-of-Experts Neural Operator for High-Confidence Design
- 2024Mastering Collaborative Multi-modal Data Selection: A Focus on Informativeness, Uniqueness, and Representativeness
- 2024FLUID-LLM: Learning Computational Fluid Dynamics with Spatiotemporal-aware Large Language Models
- 2026Signal-Aware Conditional Diffusion Surrogates for Transonic Wing Pressure Prediction