Unsupervised Expressive Rules Provide Explainability and Assist Human Experts Grasping New Domains
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Approaching new data can be quite deterrent; you do not know how your categories of interest are realized in it, commonly, there is no labeled data at hand, and the performance of domain adaptation methods is unsatisfactory. Aiming to assist domain experts in their first steps into a new task over a new corpus, we present an unsupervised approach to reveal complex rules which cluster the unexplored corpus by its prominent categories (or facets). These rules are human-readable, thus providing an important ingredient which has become in short supply lately - explainability. Each rule provides an explanation for the commonality of all the texts it clusters together. We present an extensive evaluation of the usefulness of these rules in identifying target categories, as well as a user study which assesses their interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2023Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentationcited by 42
- 2024Can LLMs Speak For Diverse People? Tuning LLMs via Debate to Generate Controllable Controversial Statementscited by 34
- 2025Large Language Models in Argument Mining: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluationcited by 13
- 2024RuleRAG: Rule-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 13
- 2021GrASP: A Library for Extracting and Exploring Human-Interpretable Textual Patternscited by 6
- 2025Limited Generalizability in Argument Mining: State-Of-The-Art Models Learn Datasets, Not Argumentscited by 5
- 2025ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentationcited by 4
- 2023Topic Ontologies for Argumentscited by 3
- 2025AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentationcited by 3
- 2024WIBA: What Is Being Argued? A Comprehensive Approach to Argument Miningcited by 2
- 2024Enhancing Investment Opinion Ranking through Argument-Based Sentiment Analysiscited by 1
1 more
- 2026An LLM-Based System for Argument Miningcited by 0
- 2026An LLM-Based System for Argument Mining13 May 2026
- 2025AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation25 Aug 2025
- 2025Large Language Models in Argument Mining: A Survey19 Jun 2025
- 2025Limited Generalizability in Argument Mining: State-Of-The-Art Models Learn Datasets, Not Arguments28 May 2025
- 2025ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentation28 May 2025
- 2024RuleRAG: Rule-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Language Models for Question Answering15 Oct 2024
- 2024Enhancing Investment Opinion Ranking through Argument-Based Sentiment Analysis25 Sep 2024
- 2024Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation5 Jun 2024
- 2024WIBA: What Is Being Argued? A Comprehensive Approach to Argument Mining1 May 2024
- 2024Can LLMs Speak For Diverse People? Tuning LLMs via Debate to Generate Controllable Controversial Statements16 Feb 2024
- 2023Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation15 Nov 2023
- 2023Topic Ontologies for Arguments23 Jan 2023
- 2023Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentationcited by 42
- 2024Can LLMs Speak For Diverse People? Tuning LLMs via Debate to Generate Controllable Controversial Statementscited by 34
- 2024Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluationcited by 13
- 2021GrASP: A Library for Extracting and Exploring Human-Interpretable Textual Patternscited by 6
- 2025ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentationcited by 4
- 2023Topic Ontologies for Argumentscited by 3
- 2025AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentationcited by 3
- 2024WIBA: What Is Being Argued? A Comprehensive Approach to Argument Miningcited by 2
- 2024Enhancing Investment Opinion Ranking through Argument-Based Sentiment Analysiscited by 1
- 2026An LLM-Based System for Argument Miningcited by 0
- 2026An LLM-Based System for Argument Mining13 May 2026
- 2025AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation25 Aug 2025
- 2025ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentation28 May 2025
- 2024Enhancing Investment Opinion Ranking through Argument-Based Sentiment Analysis25 Sep 2024
- 2024Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation5 Jun 2024
- 2024WIBA: What Is Being Argued? A Comprehensive Approach to Argument Mining1 May 2024
- 2024Can LLMs Speak For Diverse People? Tuning LLMs via Debate to Generate Controllable Controversial Statements16 Feb 2024
- 2023Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation15 Nov 2023
- 2023Topic Ontologies for Arguments23 Jan 2023
- 2021GrASP: A Library for Extracting and Exploring Human-Interpretable Textual Patterns8 Apr 2021