Dataset artefacts in anti-spoofing systems: a case study on the ASVspoof 2017 benchmark
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing and Countermeasures Challenges motivate research in protecting speech biometric systems against a variety of different access attacks. The 2017 edition focused on replay spoofing attacks, and involved participants building and training systems on a provided dataset (ASVspoof 2017). More than 60 research papers have so far been published with this dataset, but none have sought to answer why countermeasures appear successful in detecting spoofing attacks. This article shows how artefacts inherent to the dataset may be contributing to the apparent success of published systems. We first inspect the ASVspoof 2017 dataset and summarize various artefacts present in the dataset. Second, we demonstrate how countermeasure models can exploit these artefacts to appear successful in this dataset. Third, for reliable and robust performance estimates on this dataset we propose discarding nonspeech segments and silence before and after the speech utterance during training and inference. We create speech start and endpoint annotations in the dataset and demonstrate how using them helps countermeasure models become less vulnerable from being manipulated using artefacts found in the dataset. Finally, we provide several new benchmark results for both frame-level and utterance-level models that can serve as new baselines on this dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2021Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalizationcited by 6
- 2024Beyond Silence: Bias Analysis through Loss and Asymmetric Approach in Audio Anti-Spoofingcited by 2
- 2026The Watermark Shortcut: How Provenance Marking Sabotages Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 1
- 2026An Intervention-Based Framework for Shortcut Diagnosis in Spoofing Countermeasurescited by 1
- 2026Clean Accuracy Does Not Guarantee Provenance Robustness: A Prospective Codec-Stress Evaluation of Audio Attributioncited by 0
- 2026Clean Accuracy Does Not Guarantee Provenance Robustness: A Prospective Codec-Stress Evaluation of Audio Attribution7 Sep 2026
- 2026An Intervention-Based Framework for Shortcut Diagnosis in Spoofing Countermeasures3 Jul 2026
- 2026The Watermark Shortcut: How Provenance Marking Sabotages Audio Deepfake Detection22 Jun 2026
- 2024Beyond Silence: Bias Analysis through Loss and Asymmetric Approach in Audio Anti-Spoofing25 Jun 2024
- 2021Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalization26 Mar 2021