mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Projection-free Online Learning: the Strongly Convex Case

arXiv 2010.07572 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2020cs.LG math.OCcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Projection-free optimization algorithms, which are mostly based on the classical Frank-Wolfe method, have gained significant interest in the machine learning community in recent years due to their ability to handle convex constraints that are popular in many applications, but for which computing projections is often computationally impractical in high-dimensional settings, and hence prohibit the use of most standard projection-based methods. In particular, a significant research effort was put on projection-free methods for online learning. In this paper we revisit the Online Frank-Wolfe (OFW) method suggested by Hazan and Kale citeHazan12 and fill a gap that has been left unnoticed for several years: OFW achieves a faster rate of O(T2/3) on strongly convex functions (as opposed to the standard O(T3/4) for convex but not strongly convex functions), where T is the sequence length. This is somewhat surprising since it is known that for offline optimization, in general, strong convexity does not lead to faster rates for Frank-Wolfe. We also revisit the bandit setting under strong convexity and prove a similar bound of tilde O(T2/3) (instead of O(T3/4) without strong convexity). Hence, in the current state-of-affairs, the best projection-free upper-bounds for the full-information and bandit settings with strongly convex and nonsmooth functions match up to logarithmic factors in T.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022New Projection-free Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Adaptive Regret Guaranteescited by 26
  2. 2021Projection-free Distributed Online Learning with Sublinear Communication Complexitycited by 13
  3. 2022Projection-free Adaptive Regret with Membership Oraclescited by 13
  4. 2023Non-stationary Projection-free Online Learning with Dynamic and Adaptive Regret Guaranteescited by 13
  5. 2022Exploiting the Curvature of Feasible Sets for Faster Projection-Free Online Learningcited by 10
  6. 2023Projection-free Online Exp-concave Optimizationcited by 10
  7. 2023Improved Dynamic Regret for Online Frank-Wolfecited by 8
  8. 2024Improved Regret for Bandit Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedbackcited by 8
  9. 2024Optimal and Efficient Algorithms for Decentralized Online Convex Optimizationcited by 7
  10. 2021Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex Setscited by 6
  11. 2023Efficient Online Learning with Memory via Frank-Wolfe Optimization: Algorithms with Bounded Dynamic Regret and Applications to Controlcited by 5
  12. 2025Revisiting Projection-Free Online Learning with Time-Varying Constraintscited by 5
8 more
  1. 2023Riemannian Projection-free Online Learningcited by 4
  2. 2023Projection-Free Online Convex Optimization via Efficient Newton Iterationscited by 4
  3. 2022Projection-free Online Learning with Arbitrary Delayscited by 3
  4. 2025BAGEL: Adversarially Constrained Online Convex Optimization under Separation Oracle Accesscited by 3
  5. 2022A Survey on Distributed Online Optimization and Gamecited by 1
  6. 2024Optimistic Safety for Online Convex Optimization with Unknown Linear Constraintscited by 1
  7. 2024Safe Online Convex Optimization with Multi-Point Feedbackcited by 0
  8. 2026Lower Bounds for Linear-Oracle Online Learningcited by 0