mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Passive RIS vs.Hybrid RIS: A Comparative Study on Channel Estimation

arXiv 2010.06981 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2020eess.SPcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) plays an important role in maintaining the connectivity in millimeter wave (mmWave) MIMO systems when the direct channel between the transceivers is blocked. However, it is difficult to acquire the channel state information (CSI), which is essential for the design of RIS phase control matrix and beamforming vectors at the transceivers. In this paper, we compare the channel estimation (CE) performance and achieved spectral efficiency (SE) of the purely passive and hybrid RIS architectures. CE is done via atomic norm minimization (ANM). For the purely passive RIS, we follow a two-stage procedure to sequentially estimate the channel parameters, while for the hybrid RIS we estimate the individual channels at the RIS based on the observations from active RIS elements assuming alternating uplink and downlink training. The simulation results show that the purely passive RIS brings better CE and SE performance compared to the hybrid RIS under the same training overhead. We further consider different setups for the hybrid RIS and study the tradeoffs among them.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.

2 papers.