Uncertainty in Neural Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explore the effects of architecture and training objective choice on amortized posterior predictive inference in probabilistic conditional generative models. We aim this work to be a counterpoint to a recent trend in the literature that stresses achieving good samples when the amount of conditioning data is large. We instead focus our attention on the case where the amount of conditioning data is small. We highlight specific architecture and objective choices that we find lead to qualitative and quantitative improvement to posterior inference in this low data regime. Specifically we explore the effects of choices of pooling operator and variational family on posterior quality in neural processes. Superior posterior predictive samples drawn from our novel neural process architectures are demonstrated via image completion/in-painting experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Normalizing Flow-based Neural Process for Few-Shot Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 19
- 2022Evidential Conditional Neural Processescited by 10
- 2025Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximizationcited by 7
- 2023Towards Few-shot Inductive Link Prediction on Knowledge Graphs: A Relational Anonymous Walk-guided Neural Process Approachcited by 4
- 2025Bridge the Inference Gaps of Neural Processes via Expectation Maximization4 Jan 2025
- 2023Towards Few-shot Inductive Link Prediction on Knowledge Graphs: A Relational Anonymous Walk-guided Neural Process Approach26 Jun 2023
- 2023Normalizing Flow-based Neural Process for Few-Shot Knowledge Graph Completion17 Apr 2023
- 2022Evidential Conditional Neural Processes30 Nov 2022