Improving QA Generalization by Concurrent Modeling of Multiple Biases
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing NLP datasets contain various biases that models can easily exploit to achieve high performances on the corresponding evaluation sets. However, focusing on dataset-specific biases limits their ability to learn more generalizable knowledge about the task from more general data patterns. In this paper, we investigate the impact of debiasing methods for improving generalization and propose a general framework for improving the performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets by concurrent modeling of multiple biases in the training data. Our framework weights each example based on the biases it contains and the strength of those biases in the training data. It then uses these weights in the training objective so that the model relies less on examples with high bias weights. We extensively evaluate our framework on extractive question answering with training data from various domains with multiple biases of different strengths. We perform the evaluations in two different settings, in which the model is trained on a single domain or multiple domains simultaneously, and show its effectiveness in both settings compared to state-of-the-art debiasing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 97
- 2022Generalized but not Robust? Comparing the Effects of Data Modification Methods on Out-of-Domain Generalization and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 23
- 2023Quantifying and Attributing the Hallucination of Large Language Models via Association Analysiscited by 14
- 2022Which Shortcut Solution Do Question Answering Models Prefer to Learn?cited by 9
- 2022Adaptor: Objective-Centric Adaptation Framework for Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023Think Twice: Measuring the Efficiency of Eliminating Prediction Shortcuts of Question Answering Modelscited by 6
- 2022A Survey on Measuring and Mitigating Reasoning Shortcuts in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 4
- 2022Methods for Estimating and Improving Robustness of Language Modelscited by 3
- 2023SMoA: Sparse Mixture of Adapters to Mitigate Multiple Dataset Biasescited by 2
- 2021Zero-Shot Estimation of Base Models' Weights in Ensemble of Machine Reading Comprehension Systems for Robust Generalizationcited by 1
- 2022Using calibrator to improve robustness in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 0
- 2026Enhancing the QA Model through a Multi-domain Debiasing Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Enhancing the QA Model through a Multi-domain Debiasing Framework1 Jan 2026
- 2023Quantifying and Attributing the Hallucination of Large Language Models via Association Analysis11 Sep 2023
- 2023Think Twice: Measuring the Efficiency of Eliminating Prediction Shortcuts of Question Answering Models11 May 2023
- 2023SMoA: Sparse Mixture of Adapters to Mitigate Multiple Dataset Biases28 Feb 2023
- 2022Which Shortcut Solution Do Question Answering Models Prefer to Learn?29 Nov 2022
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and review6 Oct 2022
- 2022A Survey on Measuring and Mitigating Reasoning Shortcuts in Machine Reading Comprehension5 Sep 2022
- 2022Methods for Estimating and Improving Robustness of Language Models16 Jun 2022
- 2022Generalized but not Robust? Comparing the Effects of Data Modification Methods on Out-of-Domain Generalization and Adversarial Robustness15 Mar 2022
- 2022Adaptor: Objective-Centric Adaptation Framework for Language Models8 Mar 2022
- 2022Using calibrator to improve robustness in Machine Reading Comprehension24 Feb 2022
- 2021Zero-Shot Estimation of Base Models' Weights in Ensemble of Machine Reading Comprehension Systems for Robust Generalization30 Jun 2021