Not All Datasets Are Born Equal: On Heterogeneous Data and Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work on adversarial learning has focused mainly on neural networks and domains where those networks excel, such as computer vision, or audio processing. The data in these domains is typically homogeneous, whereas heterogeneous tabular datasets domains remain underexplored despite their prevalence. When searching for adversarial patterns within heterogeneous input spaces, an attacker must simultaneously preserve the complex domain-specific validity rules of the data, as well as the adversarial nature of the identified samples. As such, applying adversarial manipulations to heterogeneous datasets has proved to be a challenging task, and no generic attack method was suggested thus far. We, however, argue that machine learning models trained on heterogeneous tabular data are as susceptible to adversarial manipulations as those trained on continuous or homogeneous data such as images. To support our claim, we introduce a generic optimization framework for identifying adversarial perturbations in heterogeneous input spaces. We define distribution-aware constraints for preserving the consistency of the adversarial examples and incorporate them by embedding the heterogeneous input into a continuous latent space. Due to the nature of the underlying datasets We focus on ℓ0 perturbations, and demonstrate their applicability in real life. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using three datasets from different content domains. Our results demonstrate that despite the constraints imposed on input validity in heterogeneous datasets, machine learning models trained using such data are still equally susceptible to adversarial examples.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
- 2021Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data: Application to Fraud Detection and Imbalanced Datacited by 45
- 2021Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbationscited by 17
- 2022On The Empirical Effectiveness of Unrealistic Adversarial Hardening Against Realistic Adversarial Attackscited by 15
- 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awarenesscited by 14
- 2021Feature Importance Guided Attack: A Model Agnostic Adversarial Attackcited by 10
- 2021Selection of Source Images Heavily Influences the Effectiveness of Adversarial Attackscited by 6
- 2024Trustworthy Actionable Perturbationscited by 3
- 2023TablEye: Seeing small Tables through the Lens of Imagescited by 1
- 2024Trustworthy Actionable Perturbations18 May 2024
- 2023TablEye: Seeing small Tables through the Lens of Images4 Jul 2023
- 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awareness27 Aug 2022
- 2022On The Empirical Effectiveness of Unrealistic Adversarial Hardening Against Realistic Adversarial Attacks7 Feb 2022
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey5 Oct 2021
- 2021Feature Importance Guided Attack: A Model Agnostic Adversarial Attack28 Jun 2021
- 2021Selection of Source Images Heavily Influences the Effectiveness of Adversarial Attacks14 Jun 2021
- 2021Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations24 Feb 2021
- 2021Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data: Application to Fraud Detection and Imbalanced Data20 Jan 2021