Efficient computation of contrastive explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increasing deployment of machine learning systems in practice, transparency and explainability have become serious issues. Contrastive explanations are considered to be useful and intuitive, in particular when it comes to explaining decisions to lay people, since they mimic the way in which humans explain. Yet, so far, comparably little research has addressed computationally feasible technologies, which allow guarantees on uniqueness and optimality of the explanation and which enable an easy incorporation of additional constraints. Here, we will focus on specific types of models rather than black-box technologies. We study the relation of contrastive and counterfactual explanations and propose mathematical formalizations as well as a 2-phase algorithm for efficiently computing (plausible) pertinent positives of many standard machine learning models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processescited by 4
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Explaining Model Adaptationscited by 1
- 2024When a Relation Tells More Than a Concept: Exploring and Evaluating Classifier Decisions with CoReXcited by 1
- 2026Rethinking Explanations: Formalizing Contrast in Description Logicscited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Explanations: Formalizing Contrast in Description Logics2 May 2026
- 2024When a Relation Tells More Than a Concept: Exploring and Evaluating Classifier Decisions with CoReX2 May 2024
- 2024Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processes14 Mar 2024
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Explaining Model Adaptations6 Apr 2021