mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models

arXiv 2010.02364 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2020cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, they have been shown to be brittle. They are prone to overfitting on their training distribution and are easily fooled by small adversarial perturbations. In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize. We propose a generative model of the features extracted by a classifier, and show using rigorous hypothesis testing that errors tend to occur when features are assigned low-probability by our model. From this observation, we develop a detection criteria for samples on which a classifier is likely to fail at test time. In particular, we test against three different sources of classification failures: mistakes made on the test set due to poor model generalization, adversarial samples and out-of-distribution samples. Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.