Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation with Distant Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Data-to-Text task aims to generate human-readable text for describing some given structured data enabling more interpretability. However, the typical generation task is confined to a few particular domains since it requires well-aligned data which is difficult and expensive to obtain. Using partially-aligned data is an alternative way of solving the dataset scarcity problem. This kind of data is much easier to obtain since it can be produced automatically. However, using this kind of data induces the over-generation problem posing difficulties for existing models, which tends to add unrelated excerpts during the generation procedure. In order to effectively utilize automatically annotated partially-aligned datasets, we extend the traditional generation task to a refined task called Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation (PADTG) which is more practical since it utilizes automatically annotated data for training and thus considerably expands the application domains. To tackle this new task, we propose a novel distant supervision generation framework. It firstly estimates the input data's supportiveness for each target word with an estimator and then applies a supportiveness adaptor and a rebalanced beam search to harness the over-generation problem in the training and generation phases respectively. We also contribute a partially-aligned dataset (The data and source code of this paper can be obtained from https://github.com/fuzihaofzh/distant_supervision_nlg by sampling sentences from Wikipedia and automatically extracting corresponding KB triples for each sentence from Wikidata. The experimental results show that our framework outperforms all baseline models as well as verify the feasibility of utilizing partially-aligned data.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021JointGT: Graph-Text Joint Representation Learning for Text Generation from Knowledge Graphscited by 58
- 2023Decoder-Only or Encoder-Decoder? Interpreting Language Model as a Regularized Encoder-Decodercited by 44
- 2022Recent Advances in Neural Text Generation: A Task-Agnostic Surveycited by 14
- 2022Innovations in Neural Data-to-text Generation: A Surveycited by 10
- 2022XAlign: Cross-lingual Fact-to-Text Alignment and Generation for Low-Resource Languagescited by 4
- 2024A Systematic Review of Data-to-Text NLGcited by 4
- 2024PAGED: A Benchmark for Procedural Graphs Extraction from Documentscited by 4
- 2022Noisy Pairing and Partial Supervision for Stylized Opinion Summarizationcited by 3
- 2022XF2T: Cross-lingual Fact-to-Text Generation for Low-Resource Languagescited by 1
- 2023Knowledge Graph for NLG in the context of conversational agentscited by 1
- 2024PAGED: A Benchmark for Procedural Graphs Extraction from Documents7 Aug 2024
- 2024A Systematic Review of Data-to-Text NLG13 Feb 2024
- 2023Knowledge Graph for NLG in the context of conversational agents4 Jul 2023
- 2023Decoder-Only or Encoder-Decoder? Interpreting Language Model as a Regularized Encoder-Decoder8 Apr 2023
- 2022Noisy Pairing and Partial Supervision for Stylized Opinion Summarization16 Nov 2022
- 2022XF2T: Cross-lingual Fact-to-Text Generation for Low-Resource Languages22 Sep 2022
- 2022Innovations in Neural Data-to-text Generation: A Survey25 Jul 2022
- 2022Recent Advances in Neural Text Generation: A Task-Agnostic Survey6 Mar 2022
- 2022XAlign: Cross-lingual Fact-to-Text Alignment and Generation for Low-Resource Languages1 Feb 2022
- 2021JointGT: Graph-Text Joint Representation Learning for Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs19 Jun 2021