The Efficacy of L1 Regularization in Two-Layer Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A crucial problem in neural networks is to select the most appropriate number of hidden neurons and obtain tight statistical risk bounds. In this work, we present a new perspective towards the bias-variance tradeoff in neural networks. As an alternative to selecting the number of neurons, we theoretically show that L1 regularization can control the generalization error and sparsify the input dimension. In particular, with an appropriate L1 regularization on the output layer, the network can produce a statistical risk that is near minimax optimal. Moreover, an appropriate L1 regularization on the input layer leads to a risk bound that does not involve the input data dimension. Our analysis is based on a new amalgamation of dimension-based and norm-based complexity analysis to bound the generalization error. A consequent observation from our results is that an excessively large number of neurons do not necessarily inflate generalization errors under a suitable regularization.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024ProSparse: Introducing and Enhancing Intrinsic Activation Sparsity within Large Language Modelscited by 43
- 2025Engram Memory Encoding and Retrieval: A Neurocomputational Perspectivecited by 2
- 2022Sparse Centroid-Encoder: A Nonlinear Model for Feature Selectioncited by 0
- 2023Feature Selection using Sparse Adaptive Bottleneck Centroid-Encodercited by 0
- 2025Engram Memory Encoding and Retrieval: A Neurocomputational Perspective2 Jun 2025
- 2024ProSparse: Introducing and Enhancing Intrinsic Activation Sparsity within Large Language Models21 Feb 2024
- 2023Feature Selection using Sparse Adaptive Bottleneck Centroid-Encoder7 Jun 2023
- 2022Sparse Centroid-Encoder: A Nonlinear Model for Feature Selection30 Jan 2022