mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Metrics for Benchmarking and Uncertainty Quantification: Quality, Applicability, and a Path to Best Practices for Machine Learning in Chemistry

arXiv 2010.00110 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2020physics.chem-ph cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This review aims to draw attention to two issues of concern when we set out to make machine learning work in the chemical and materials domain, i.e., statistical loss function metrics for the validation and benchmarking of data-derived models, and the uncertainty quantification of predictions made by them. They are often overlooked or underappreciated topics as chemists typically only have limited training in statistics. Aside from helping to assess the quality, reliability, and applicability of a given model, these metrics are also key to comparing the performance of different models and thus for developing guidelines and best practices for the successful application of machine learning in chemistry.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

9 papers.