An Analysis of Quality Indicators Using Approximated Optimal Distributions in a Three-dimensional Objective Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although quality indicators play a crucial role in benchmarking evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms, their properties are still unclear. One promising approach for understanding quality indicators is the use of the optimal distribution of objective vectors that optimizes each quality indicator. However, it is difficult to obtain the optimal distribution for each quality indicator, especially when its theoretical property is unknown. Thus, optimal distributions for most quality indicators have not been well investigated. To address these issues, first, we propose a problem formulation of finding the optimal distribution for each quality indicator on an arbitrary Pareto front. Then, we approximate the optimal distributions for nine quality indicators using the proposed problem formulation. We analyze the nine quality indicators using their approximated optimal distributions on eight types of Pareto fronts of three-objective problems. Our analysis demonstrates that uniformly-distributed objective vectors over the entire Pareto front are not optimal in many cases. Each quality indicator has its own optimal distribution for each Pareto front. We also examine the consistency among the nine quality indicators.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.