mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Adaptive Trust Calibration for Level 2 Driving Automation

arXiv 2009.11890 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2020cs.HC cs.RO cs.SYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Properly calibrated human trust is essential for successful interaction between humans and automation. However, while human trust calibration can be improved by increased automation transparency, too much transparency can overwhelm human workload. To address this tradeoff, we present a probabilistic framework using a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) for modeling the coupled trust-workload dynamics of human behavior in an action-automation context. We specifically consider hands-off Level 2 driving automation in a city environment involving multiple intersections where the human chooses whether or not to rely on the automation. We consider automation reliability, automation transparency, and scene complexity, along with human reliance and eye-gaze behavior, to model the dynamics of human trust and workload. We demonstrate that our model framework can appropriately vary automation transparency based on real-time human trust and workload belief estimates to achieve trust calibration.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.